Wednesday, January 04, 2012

first day of work

yup,i went with my dad to his office. started to work with him eventhough i got no idea what am i supposed to do there. my dad has his workers. i just sighed. somehow,i cannot be sitting free at home,facing the computer. my eye power has raised due to this. haha. me and dad had breakfast at macdonald's. i brought some novels in case i feel bored there. then,we went to office and dad was busy with his workers. he asked me to type few quotations to be faxed to his customers. so,i did it. towards the end,my fingers hurt like hell. well,i need to do something for the salary i get. so,i did not mind. dad is very strict when it comes to business.

in the afternoon,dad brought me to kepong to meet one of his customer. why should i follow ?! oh god. all the way we went to kepong and met a chinese man. i seriously don't understand the "malay" language that he was talking. ;p i wonder how dad could understand. few hours spending there,dad sent me back to office and he went to send mummy's car for service. so bored now. i was just watching the workers doing their work. dad will scold them if they be careless in their work. arghh~

uncle got me food for lunch. as i was bored,i thought of watching 7am arivu. lol. i havent watched it yet because i hate shruti hassan. but i got no choice now. i don't want to die out of boredom. that movie is a mind-opening movie. i really love it. it is a big slap to our indian community. i founded that the great patriac was an indian. yup,bodhidharma is an hindu. we,indians are never even bothered to know that. so shame of us not knowing our culture and tradition and due to our mistakes,invaders take away all our knowledge and traditions,claiming that is theirs in the end. ;(. this should not happen.

my parents always tell that our biggest mistake is we love to condemn people. that is our weakness. bodhidharma is now worshipped eternally in china,but here,we ? we dont even know him. he ought to be worshipped here too,by all the indians. he is an hindu not a chinese monk. kung fu belongs to us. unfortunately,we never take it seriously. a piece of article from wikipedia and other trusted websites have been enclosed here. dear friends,they are many hindu monks that we never cared to know. they had contributed a lot. so please,lets find out all the meaningful people. jai Hindu !!

These sources vary on their account of Bodhidharma being either "from Persia" (547 CE), "a Brahman monk from South India" (645 CE), "the third son of a Brahman king of South India" (ca. 715 CE).[1] Some traditions specifically describe Bodhidharma to be the third son of aPallava king from Kanchipuram.


The second account was written by T'an-lín ). T'an-lín's brief biography of the "DharmaMaster" is found in his preface to the Two Entrances and Four Acts, a text traditionally attributed to Bodhidharma, and the first text to identify Bodhidharma as South Indian:
"The Dharma Master was a South Indian of the Western Region. He was the third son of a great Indian king. His ambition lay in the Mahayana path, and so he put aside his white layman's robe for the black robe of a monk [...] Lamenting the decline of the true teaching in the outlands, he subsequently crossed distant mountains and seas, traveling about propagating the teaching in Han and Wei."[9]
T'an-lín's account was the first to mention that Bodhidharma attracted disciples, specifically mentioning Dàoyù (道育) and Huìkě (慧可), the latter of whom would later figure very prominently in the Bodhidharma literature.
T'an-lín has traditionally been considered a disciple of Bodhidharma, but it is more likely that he was a student of Huìkě, who in turn was a student of Bodhidharma.

In the context of the Indian caste system the mention of "Brahman king acquires a nuance. Broughton notes that "king" implies that Bodhidharma was of a member of the Kshatriya caste of warriors and rulers. Brahman is, in western contexts, easily understood as Brahmana or Brahmin, which means priest.

Martial arts

Traditionally Bodhidharma is being credited to be the founder of the martial arts at the Shaolin Temple. However, martial arts historians have shown this legend stems from a 17th century qigong manual known as the Yijin Jing.

Bodhidharma was a Buddhist monk who lived during the 5th/6th century and is traditionally credited as the leading patriarch and transmitter of Zen (Chinese: Chan, Sanskrit: Dhyana) to China. He was the third son of a Tamil king of the Pallava Dynasty. According to Chinese legend, he also began the physical training of the Shaolin monks that led to the creation of Shaolinquan. However, martial arts historians have shown this legend stems from a 17th century qigong manual known as the Yijin Jing.


Little contemporary biographical information on Bodhidharma is extant, and subsequent accounts became layered with legend, but some accounts state that he was from a Brahman family in southern India and possibly of royal lineage.However Broughton (1999:2) notes that Bodhidharma's royal pedigree implies that he was of the Kshatriya warrior caste. Mahajan (1972:705–707) argued that the Pallava dynasty was a Tamilian dynasty and Zvelebil (1987) proposed that Bodhidharma was born a prince of the Pallava dynasty in their capital of Kanchipuram[4] Scholars have concluded his place of birth to be Kanchipuram in Tamil Nadu, India.


After becoming a Buddhist monk, Bodhidharma traveled to China. The accounts differ on the date of his arrival, with one early account claiming that he arrived during the Liú Sòng Dynasty (420–479) and later accounts dating his arrival to the Liáng Dynasty (502–557). Bodhidharma was primarily active in the lands of the Northern Wèi Dynasty (386–534). Modern scholarship dates him to about the early 5th century.


Throughout Buddhist art, Bodhidharma is depicted as a rather ill-tempered, profusely bearded and wide-eyed barbarian. He is described as "The Blue-Eyed Barbarian" in Chinese texts.


The Anthology of the Patriarchal Hall (952) identifies Bodhidharma as the 28th Patriarch of Buddhism in an uninterrupted line that extends all the way back to the Buddha himself. D.T. Suzuki contends that Chán's growth in popularity during the 7th and 8th centuries attracted criticism that it had "no authorized records of its direct transmission from the founder of Buddhism" and that Chán historians made Bodhidharma the 28th patriarch of Buddhism in response to such attacks.


PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN !

No comments:

Post a Comment